Licensed operators hold the seats, share one stablecoin API — and a defined stake in the network itself is part of the proposed member terms.
Prix
Alivio
Ágil Cash
Glosa
Glosa Perú🇵🇪
Arkana
Arcore
GCGlobal Coin
DoPayment
Prix
Alivio
Ágil Cash
Glosa
Glosa Perú🇵🇪
Arkana
Arcore
GCGlobal Coin
DoPayment
The giants are consolidating stablecoin infrastructure — and in every deal, the local operators who carried the flows held no stake in the outcome.
A full KYC/KYB/KYT stack, licence and audit — per market, alone.
Institutional custody is quote-based with US$1M+ minimums; Circle raised USDC redemption fees in 2026.
Pre-funded accounts, spread every hop. Aggregators kept the spread.
Platforms KYC your customer and own the terms. You are the invisible last mile.
B2B stablecoin payments reached an annualized US$226B by December 2025, up 733%. Whoever owns the rails captures the next decade of that flow.
GENIUS enacted, MiCA in force, Brazil's BCB rules live — reserving stablecoin cross-border flows to authorized providers from October 2026. The window to claim a seat is the window the giants are buying.
The precedent is Visa: member banks formed a cooperative; its 2008 IPO paid those members about US$16B in cash for their seats. In 2026 the largest banks are building jointly-owned stablecoin networks again — for themselves. Soberana opens the same structure to licensed local operators.
A jointly-owned stablecoin company — announced September 1, 2026.
A shared deposit-token network built by its owner banks.
ZelleUSD — Zelle's own cross-border stablecoin.
37 European banks behind a MiCA euro stablecoin.
Four consortiums, one design — the members own the network. One admission policy: no local fintech, no PSP, no operator outside the club. Soberana is the same move, for the operators the clubs leave out.
The network never fronts your market or resells your territory.
Plus the distinction our 24-provider review found nowhere in public terms: a reserved share of any network-level exit, defined in the proposed member agreements.
Onboard once; other members may reuse the evidence through documented reliance where each regulator permits — every member remains fully responsible.
Network-level insurance and institutional custody are being structured at network scale; scope and terms are finalized in the member agreements — nothing is promised until signed.
In-network demand routes to the member seat for that market. The client lands on your paper.
Corridors activate as members, permissions and funding come online. One integration replaces a bilateral agreement per corridor.
Every member makes the network stronger and cheaper for the ones already in.
Three realistic paths. Two are well documented. The third did not exist until now.
| Dimension | Build alone | Global platform (Bridge–Stripe class) | Aggregator (Thunes class) | The Soberana Network |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Rebuilt per market | Platform's licences, platform's terms | Yours, per market | Shared evidence, reused where regulators permit |
| Custody | Retail | Platform product, fee-based | Not provided | Program under structuring, at network scale |
| Liquidity | Pre-funded, full spread | Platform spread | Network keeps the spread | Coordinated prefunding; netting where legally supported |
| Distribution | Home market only | None — one of thousands of tenants | Network sells; you terminate | In-network demand routed to your seat |
| Who owns the client | You | Shared — end users accept platform terms | The network | You |
| Territory | Yours, alone | None | None — deliberate redundancy | One seat per country, per rail. Protected territory. |
| Who owns the network | — | Their shareholders | Their shareholders | The members |
| When the network exits | — | Partners: US$0. | Partners: US$0. | A reserved share for the member pool, defined in the proposed member agreements |
We examined 24 platforms and aggregators serving local operators — no publicly disclosed equivalent of partner equity, exit participation, or protected territory; private terms unknown. Every network pays partners fees. Some share yield. None shares itself in public terms.
Platforms sell you rails. Aggregators rent your last mile. Soberana is the network you own.
Spun out of
— licensed rails in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. Not a roadmap: production infrastructure, live today.
Hosted or API onboarding · fiat and multi-chain wallet creation with balances.
On-ramps via payment links and virtual accounts · off-ramps to validated bank beneficiaries.
Wallet-to-wallet P2P, on-chain outbound · indicative and locked FX quotes with fees.
| Market | Rails | Status |
|---|---|---|
| United States | ACH · Wire | LIVE |
| Mexico | SPEI | LIVE |
| Brazil | PIX | LIVE |
| Colombia | co-ACH · Bre-B | LIVE |
| Ecuador | SPI | LIVE |
| Peru | Yape · PagoEfectivo | LIVE |
| Central America | ACH · SINPE | ROADMAP |
| Europe | SEPA · UK FPS | ROADMAP |
| India · Singapore · UAE | UPI · PayNow · UPTS | ROADMAP |
| Your market | Your rails | NEXT |
API docs & sandbox: API Docs — open for technical due diligence today.
A small, fixed number per country, per rail. The market is never resold around its holder; allocations are protected by the rulebook and conditioned on operating performance.
Seat map beyond live markets is illustrative — final markets and structure are set in each member agreement.
For licensed local fintechs and PSPs with real in-market distribution.
For banks, insurers and regulated financial institutions.
The operators who carry the flows hold the seats, share the cost base, and a defined stake in the network itself is proposed in both directions, as set out in the member agreements.
A reserved share of any network-level exit is set aside for the member pool under the proposed member agreements.
The network would hold reciprocal rights in each member under the proposed intercompany agreement — scaling costs and negotiating power.
| Cost line — illustrative unit-cost model (member alone = 100) | Alone | With the network |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud & compute | 100 | 55 |
| Liquidity & FX spread | 100 | 60 |
| Custody | 100 | Under structuring — targeted at network scale |
Illustrative model of network versus stand-alone procurement, pending member agreements. Targets, not commitments.
A seat must justify itself without any exit: measurable inbound flow from other members' corridors, lower all-in operating and capital costs, and network liquidity. If the network is never sold, membership still has to be the better way to operate.
A payment network designed so the licensed operators who run its seats hold a defined stake, under the proposed member agreements — the Visa and SWIFT model, applied to stablecoin rails.
Platforms onboard your users under their terms and keep the upside. Soberana members integrate a comparable API — and hold a seat with protected territory and a defined stake in the network, under the member agreements.
Aggregators sign the sender as their client and use local institutions as interchangeable payout suppliers. Soberana inverts every term.
A customer onboarded under network KYC/KYB/KYT standards can have that evidence reused by other members through documented reliance where each regulator permits; every member remains fully responsible for its own decisions and reporting.
Licensed fintechs and PSPs apply for a founding seat; banks and regulated institutions apply for an institutional seat. Eligibility and terms are set out in the membership proposal and definitive agreements — it starts with the eligibility application.
United States (ACH, Wire), Mexico (SPEI), Brazil (PIX), Colombia (co-ACH, Bre-B), Ecuador (SPI) and Peru (Yape, PagoEfectivo). Sandbox and documentation are public.
Authorizations in good standing in every market the member operates, the network's compliance and uptime standards, and real flow. Allocations are performance-based — protected while the member operates to network standards.
No. A seat must justify itself on corridor economics — inbound flow, lower all-in costs, shared compliance evidence, network liquidity. The reserved share in any change of control, defined in the member agreements, is the structural difference, not the pitch.
Nothing on this page is an offer of securities — see the disclaimer below.